OM's profile picture

OM

@om

Partner Emeritus @TrueVentures. Founder of GigaOM. I write about technology!
✉️ Newsletter: https://t.co/1QnOQ6s9On
🔗 Blog: om
📸 Photos: https://t.co/5Liw8bDtTp

United States
twitter
Followers
1,225,620
Following
1,624
Posts
66,681
Engagement Rate
0.00%
Campaigns Featured in
1

Recent Posts

Tue Apr 08

RT @howardlindzon: ok … ai is funnier than most humans already chamois in his natural habitat

Mon Apr 07

RT @jerallaire: Thrilled to share that @kevinweil, chief product officer of OpenAI,  will serve as an advisor to me and Circle.  Kevin’s ca…

Mon Apr 07

RT @NaveenGRao: “LLM systems reason like people. Wait, what is reasoning exactly?" I’ve often found it hard to articulate why LLM-based AI…

Mon Apr 07

RT @mjtsai: Posts updated today: macOS 15.4 https://t.co/kqv8IWINGM iOS 18.4 https://t.co/lIvOjJdjy6 Altman https://t.co/cUmrw5ASxp Mi…

Mon Apr 07

RT @kevinweil: Great note from @tobi on using AI to accelerate. Like any other new skill, you have to work at it—but the returns to doing s…

Mon Apr 07

RT @pt: The thing about bring a successful bullshit artist is you don’t have to say things that are true, you just have to say things that…

Post by om
Fri Apr 04

RT @stevesi: https://t.co/3kqhBJ5B0M

Fri Apr 04

RT @howardlindzon: Shameless Chamois … How’s the DPI

10
1
Fri Apr 04

This turned into a short essay about innovation and thinking different. https://t.co/pGpCSQmCRj

Wed Apr 02

RT @parkerconrad: Deel CEO and company founder @Bouazizalex personally orchestrated his company’s alleged spy scheme, the spy said in a fu…

3
1
Tue Apr 01

Torpedo Bat is a living testimony that innovation through a combination of data, design, and science can happen in products that are even a century old. I have seen this before. My friend Ian Schon did this when he designed and made his Monoc nib. There are so many new ways to do old things, as long as one puts their mind to it! !

Tue Apr 01

RT @BColon40: I wonder how many home runs I would’ve hit with a torpedo bat 🤔

Tue Apr 01

RT @eastdakota: I’d seen parts of this Steve Jobs talk, never seen the whole thing until tonight. Pretty incredible on multiple levels. Fi…

5
Tue Apr 01

“The first of April is the day we remember what we are the other 364 days of the year.” Mark Twain. #aprilfoolsday

12
1
Tue Apr 01

Repeat after me 1. No data is private 2. No data is deleted 3. Nothing in hindsight can save your data To paraphrase @scottmcnealy the only thing private is what’s in your head.

Tue Apr 01

RT @NyayBhushan: Hi Shekhar Have you tried out the WAVES app from @prasarbharati ? Would like to know your honest opinion as to whether thi…

5
Tue Apr 01

At $100 billion @xai feels like a value investment in comparison. 🙃 Jokes aside, amazing news for @sama + team. Keep on launching.

152
8
Mon Mar 31

Google was once the company that made products you couldn’t wait to use everyday. From search to Google Mail to Google Calendar, they seemed like an innovation machine. Today? It feels like a shadow of its former self, stuck in a strange cycle of mediocrity, bureaucracy, and ad-driven priorities. Here's why: Vanishing Innovation: Remember when Google was synonymous with cutting-edge technology? We don’t think about it, but before Google got its hands on “location” and “maps” and turned it into daily magic, we were stuck with MapQuest. These days, nothing it creates and announces sparks joy. And even their once best-of-breedproducts have become a source of frustration. Google Search—once a revolutionary tool, now buried under AI-generated reviews and endless ads. Advertising Over Users: Google’s founders warned about this in 1998: an ad-driven business model would inevitably conflict with user needs. Fast forward to 2025, and they’ve become the very thing they feared. Search is no longer built for discovery; it’s built for revenue. Even their AI efforts, like Gemini, that been grafted into search and their other offerings feel more like products of corporate inertia than true innovation. Bureaucracy Is Killing Creativity: Google’s culture has shifted. Instead of simple, user-focused products, we get bloated, over-engineered offerings. AI Studio, a tool that could’ve been Google’s answer to OpenAI’s simplicity, is needlessly complex—designed by committee, not visionaries. The company has more managers than some startups have employees, and it shows. The bigger picture? Google is on the same trajectory of corporate irrelevance as AT&T, Microsoft (in its pre-Satya days), and IBM. It’s a giant that’s losing its pole position in a rapidly evolving tech landscape. In my first conversation with Google’s founders, they told me that Google’s goal was to send people to the information they were looking for. They dreamed of simplicity and putting users ahead of everything. Perhaps, for those of us who remember Google’s promise, this decline feels personal. It’s painful to watch a company that once led with purpose now stumble under its own weight.

Post by om
10
1
Mon Mar 31

If you’re curious about the full story—including why Google’s ad-driven model might be its undoing—check out the full piece here: https://t.co/sGLwoBwAFN What do you think? Is Google too far gone, or can it turn things around? https://t.co/mtBYTlrKVK

Sun Mar 30

RT @howardlindzon: go @mcuban … legend